B2B Beauty Marketplace

A wholesale beauty marketplace proved direct-response sales could outperform lead generation once audience, offer and message were tested together.

B2B beauty marketplace advertising case study
<£10
Registration cost
34.12x
ROAS achieved
B2B beauty
Industry
United Kingdom
Country
Google Ads
Meta Ads
Platforms
2017

Founded
5 years

Engagement

Insight

The marketplace entered paid advertising without an established acquisition playbook.

The initial assumption was that wholesale buyers would need a lead-generation journey before they were ready to purchase. Early campaign behaviour showed that this was not always true: direct-response ecommerce could work when the product, message and buyer context aligned.

The larger difficulty was audience definition. Retailers, salons, spas, independent practitioners and ecommerce businesses could all appear relevant, but they did not share the same needs or commercial value.

Messaging and the lead magnet were equally unproven, creating too many variables for a single campaign to answer.

The account needed structured testing before it needed scale.

This reframed the problem:

The task was not to choose lead generation or ecommerce in advance. It was to discover which business audience needed which route to conversion.

Execution

We treated audience, offer and conversion path as three connected testing layers.

Direct-response purchase campaigns ran alongside registration-focused activity, allowing revenue and lead quality to be compared rather than judged in isolation.

Audience tests separated business types by commercial intent, likely order behaviour and fit with the available product range.

Creative and copy then tested practical buying motives including product access, curation, convenience and margin opportunity.

The lead magnet was tested across formats and messages to identify what could attract qualified businesses without producing low-value registrations.

At the same time, product-led advertising gave ready buyers a direct route to purchase when an additional lead step was unnecessary.

Search and paid-social activity were measured against both acquisition cost and downstream sales.

Tracking connected registrations, orders and revenue so that the apparently cheaper route could not hide weaker commercial outcomes.

The result was a flexible B2B acquisition system:

  • Business-type segmentation → identify valuable buyers
  • Lead-generation offers → educate and qualify earlier demand
  • Direct-response ads → convert purchase-ready businesses

The winning strategy combined both paths and assigned each to the audience most likely to respond.

Results

The testing programme replaced a strategy based on assumptions with one based on buyer behaviour.

  • Registrations acquired for under £10
  • More than £14,000 in sales generated from under £500 advertising spend
  • 34.12x return on advertising spend achieved

Direct response became a proven revenue route rather than an exception, while lead generation remained useful where buyers needed more context.

The business left the testing phase with clearer audience priorities, stronger messaging and a measurable basis for scaling B2B advertising.

Strategic Takeaway

"In B2B ecommerce, the shortest route to revenue should be tested—not assumed. Audience, offer and conversion path must prove themselves together."

Thank you! We’ll contact you soon.
image of front desk of the dance studio
Submission error. Please check your info.
Contact

Start your project with us

Complete the form to connect with our team. We’ll respond quickly to your inquiry.

  • London, UK
    Monday – Friday
  • 9AM to 9PM